banner



2080 Ti Vs 3060 12gb

RTX 2080 Ti vs RTX 3060 Ti

Price now 845$

Games supported 100%

Cost now 540$

Games supported 100%

General info

Comparison of graphics card architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.

Identify in operation rating fourteen 18
Value for money 39.28 61.81
Architecture Turing (2018−2021) Ampere (2020−2022)
GPU lawmaking name Turing TU102 Ampere GA104
Marketplace segment Desktop Desktop
Release appointment 27 August 2018 (three years agone) ane December 2020 (1 year ago)
Launch cost (MSRP) $999 $399
Toll now $845 (0.8x MSRP) $540 (1.4x MSRP)

Value for money

To get the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.

Technical specs

General performance parameters such as number of shaders, GPU cadre base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, merely for precise cess you accept to consider their benchmark and gaming test results. Notation that power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores 4352 no data
Core clock speed 1350 MHz no data
Heave clock speed 1545 MHz no data
Number of transistors 18,600 million 17,400 million
Manufacturing procedure technology 12 nm 8 nm
Thermal design power (TDP) 270 Watt no information
Texture fill rate 420.2 253.ane

Compatibility, dimensions and requirements

Data on compatibility with other calculator components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and passenger vehicle (motherboard compatibility), additional ability connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interface PCIe 3.0 x16 PCIe 4.0 x16
Length 267 mm 242 mm
Width 2-slot no data
Supplementary power connectors 2x 8-pin no data

Memory

Parameters of memory installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Annotation that GPUs integrated into processors take no dedicated VRAM and use a shared role of organization RAM.

Retentivity type GDDR6 no data
Maximum RAM amount eleven GB no data
Memory jitney width 352 Fleck no data
Memory clock speed 14000 MHz no data
Memory bandwidth 616.0 GB/southward no data
Shared memory - -

Video outputs and ports

Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. Every bit a rule, data in this section is precise simply for desktop reference ones (so-chosen Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.

Display Connectors 1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C no data
HDMI + no data
K-SYNC support + no data

Technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information volition prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

API back up

APIs supported, including detail versions of those APIs.

DirectX 12 Ultimate (12_1) no information
Shader Model half-dozen.five six.5
OpenGL 4.6 no data
OpenCL ii.0 no data
Vulkan ane.2.131 1.2
CUDA vii.5 eight.6

Criterion performance

Non-gaming benchmark performance comparison. Note that overall criterion performance is measured in points in 0-100 range.


Overall score

This is our combined criterion performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you notice some perceived inconsistencies, feel gratuitous to speak up in comments section, nosotros usually prepare bug quickly.

  • Passmark
  • 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
  • 3DMark Deject Gate GPU
  • 3DMark Fire Strike Score
  • 3DMark Burn Strike Graphics
  • GeekBench 5 OpenCL
  • GeekBench 5 Vulkan
  • GeekBench 5 CUDA

This is probably the most ubiquitous benchmark, part of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various load, providing 4 separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, xi and 12 (the terminal beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

Criterion coverage: 25%

3DMark 11 is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on two scenes, 1 being few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken transport, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in January 2020, 3DMark 11 is now superseded by Time Spy.

Benchmark coverage: 16%

Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for abode PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird infinite teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using fixed resolution of 1280x720. Merely like Ice Storm criterion, information technology has been discontinued in January 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.

Criterion coverage: 13%

Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 benchmark for gaming PCs. It features ii separate tests displaying a fight betwixt a humanoid and a peppery creature seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.

Benchmark coverage: 13%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics menu benchmark combined from eleven different examination scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'south processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses OpenCL API by Khronos Grouping.

Criterion coverage: 9%

RTX 2080 Ti 138925

+fifteen.6%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card criterion combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on directly usage of GPU'south processing ability, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses Vulkan API by AMD & Khronos Group.

Benchmark coverage: 5%

RTX 2080 Ti 119018

+24.6%

Geekbench 5 is a widespread graphics card benchmark combined from 11 different test scenarios. All these scenarios rely on direct usage of GPU'due south processing power, no 3D rendering is involved. This variation uses CUDA API by NVIDIA.

Criterion coverage: 5%

RTX 2080 Ti 165093

+28.7%

Gaming performance

Let's see how proficient the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Item gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across unlike resolutions:

Total Hd 165 144
1440p 121 92
4K 90 60

Full Hd
Low Preset

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75 78

Full HD
Medium Preset

Assassin'south Creed Odyssey 125

+3.3%

121

−3.3%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 107

+12.six%

95

−12.6%

Battleground five 170

+17.2%

145

−17.2%

Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare 70−75

+7.4%

65−lxx

−7.four%

Cyberpunk 2077 lxx−75

−6.8%

78

+6.eight%

Far Cry five 136

−13.2%

154

+13.2%

Far Cry New Dawn 110

−0.9%

111

+0.9%

Forza Horizon 4 182

−nine.nine%

200

+ix.9%

Hitman 3 171

+151%

65−70

−151%

Horizon Zero Dawn 146

+v%

139

−five%

Cherry-red Dead Redemption 2 119

−29.4%

154

+29.4%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 144

−ix%

157

+9%

Watch Dogs: Legion 111

−9.9%

122

+9.9%

Full Hard disk drive
High Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 108

+3.8%

104

−3.8%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 91

+12.iii%

81

−12.3%

Battlefield 5 164

+32.iii%

124

−32.iii%

Call of Duty: Mod Warfare 81

+19.i%

65−seventy

−19.1%

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75

−6.eight%

78

+6.viii%

Far Cry five 130

−12.3%

146

+12.3%

Far Weep New Dawn 106

−1.nine%

108

+one.9%

Forza Horizon four 181

−8.3%

196

+eight.3%

Hitman 3 163

+140%

65−seventy

−140%

Horizon Zero Dawn 124

+6.9%

116

−6.9%

Metro Exodus 107

−two.8%

110

+2.viii%

Cerise Dead Redemption 2 90

+1.1%

89

−i.one%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 139

−seven.2%

149

+7.two%

The Witcher three: Wild Hunt 247

+13.iii%

218

−thirteen.3%

Spotter Dogs: Legion 99

−10.1%

109

+10.one%

Full HD
Ultra Preset

Assassin's Creed Odyssey 82

+ix.3%

75

−ix.3%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 80

+8.1%

74

−8.i%

Battlefield v 159

+39.v%

114

−39.v%

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75

−v.v%

77

+5.five%

Far Cry 5 122

−12.3%

137

+12.three%

Far Cry New Dawn 96

−three.1%

99

+3.1%

Forza Horizon 4 168

−3%

173

+three%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 135

+23.9%

109

−23.ix%

Sentry Dogs: Legion 90

+16.9%

77

−16.9%

1440p
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 127

+86.8%

65−70

−86.viii%

Hitman 3 147

+116%

65−70

−116%

Horizon Zero Dawn 94

+ii.2%

92

−2.2%

Metro Exodus 76

+fifteen.2%

66

−xv.2%

Red Dead Redemption 2 63

+ten.5%

57

−10.5%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 110

+6.8%

103

−half-dozen.8%

1440p
Ultra Preset

Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey 72

+x.8%

65

−ten.8%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 67

+11.seven%

60

−xi.vii%

Battleground 5 134

+36.7%

98

−36.7%

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75

+forty.4%

52

−40.4%

Far Cry 5 117

+6.4%

110

−6.4%

Far Weep New Dawn 98

+4.3%

94

−4.3%

Forza Horizon 4 147

−2%

150

+2%

Watch Dogs: Legion 73

+23.7%

59

−23.seven%

4K
High Preset

Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 77

+13.2%

65−70

−13.two%

Hitman iii 85

+25%

65−70

−25%

Horizon Zero Dawn 54

+1.ix%

53

−1.9%

Metro Exodus 51

+xviii.half dozen%

43

−18.half dozen%

Scarlet Dead Redemption two 42

+x.five%

38

−10.five%

Shadow of the Tomb Raider 61

+eight.9%

56

−viii.nine%

The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 98

+21%

81

−21%

4K
Ultra Preset

Assassinator'due south Creed Odyssey 50

+11.ane%

45

−xi.one%

Assassin's Creed Valhalla 46

+15%

40

−15%

Battlefield 5 86

+32.iii%

65

−32.iii%

Cyberpunk 2077 70−75

+192%

25

−192%

Far Weep 5 78

+20%

65

−20%

Far Weep New Dawn 77

+18.five%

65

−18.5%

Forza Horizon 4 107

+3.ix%

103

−three.nine%

Watch Dogs: Legion 44

+33.3%

33

−33.3%

Advantages and disadvantages


Functioning rating 73.23 68.29
Novelty 27 Baronial 2018 1 December 2020
Cost $999 $399
Chip lithography 12 nm eight nm

Technical City couldn't decide betwixt

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

and

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

The differences in performance seem likewise pocket-size.


Should you all the same accept questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, inquire them in Comments section, and we shall answer.

Cast your vote

Exercise you lot recollect we are right or mistaken in our choice? Vote past clicking "Like" push button near your favorite graphics card.


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

Competitors of GeForce RTX 2080 Ti by AMD

We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti from AMD is Radeon RX 6800, which is slower by 5% and lower by 3 positions in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2080 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti 100

Competitors of GeForce RTX 3060 Ti past AMD

The nearest GeForce RTX 3060 Ti'due south AMD equivalent is Radeon RX 6800, which is faster by two% and higher by 1 position in our rating.

Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 3060 Ti:

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti 100

Similar GPU comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

User rating

Here you tin can see the user rating of the graphics cards, besides equally rate them yourself.


Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Ti on a scale of 1 to 5:

Rate NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3060 Ti on a calibration of 1 to v:

Questions and comments

Hither you can ask a question about this comparison, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an error or mismatch.


Graphics settings

Screen resolution

FPS

Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2080-Ti-vs-GeForce-RTX-3060-Ti

0 Response to "2080 Ti Vs 3060 12gb"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel